Re: Extrange behavior with fields

Author

Message

Gustavo Ricardi

Posted: 09/02/2004 23:36:44

I understand what you mean. Anyway the behavior you propose still seems to

me incorrect if you don't fix the problem of not allowing to delete the

first character. May be you should add some option to allow the first

character blank and read-only, so you do not allow to delete the character

but neither insert a character in this position.

Gustavo

"Sergey Tkachenko" <[email protected]> wrote in message

> Really, empty items should not be allowed, and attempts to add it should

> generate an exception.

> But if I do it, it can break existing code in many projects.

> >

> > I understand about rvpDeleteProtect, but if you can add a field with

empty

> > content, I don't understand why you can't fill it in and then clean up

the

> > whole content without deleting the field, just returning to the original

> > state. My appreciation might be incorrect, but it continues being a bug

> for

> > me. May be a by design bug ;-)